How do you keep auto-generated documentation from getting instantly outdated when a UI changes?
Keep auto-generated documentation current by re-recording the workflow whenever the UI changes — it takes the same 5 minutes as the original recording. Subscribe to your SaaS vendors' changelogs to get notified about UI updates, set quarterly review reminders for high-traffic guides, and empower any team member to flag or re-record outdated SOPs.
Why is this easier with auto-generated docs?
| Update Approach | Manual SOP | Auto-Generated SOP |
|---|---|---|
| Time to update | 60+ minutes (re-screenshot, rewrite) | 5 minutes (re-record) |
| Motivation to update | Low — nobody wants to redo the work | High — re-recording is quick |
| Accuracy | Depends on the writer's attention | Captures the exact current UI |
| Consistency | Varies by who updates | Same format every time |
What is the maintenance system?
- Subscribe to changelogs — Follow release notes for your key SaaS tools
- Set quarterly reviews — Each SOP owner reviews their top 5 guides every quarter
- Create a #doc-updates Slack channel — Anyone can flag an outdated SOP
- Empower re-recording — Anyone with Glyde access can re-record and replace a guide
- Track "last updated" dates — Add a date field to each SOP in your wiki
How do you prioritize which SOPs to update?
| Priority | Criteria | Update Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Used daily, high error cost | Update immediately when UI changes |
| High | Used weekly by multiple people | Update within 1 week of UI change |
| Medium | Used monthly or by a few people | Update at next quarterly review |
| Low | Rarely used or archival | Update only if someone reports an issue |
The key advantage of auto-generated documentation: updating is just as fast as creating. There is no penalty for keeping things current.
This answer is part of our guide to SOP tools compared.