All answers

How do I migrate my company's existing SOPs from Scribe to another documentation tool?

March 6, 2026·2 min read·SOP Tools Compared

Migrate from Scribe by exporting each guide as a PDF or copying the content to your new platform. Most Scribe guides can be recreated faster than migrated — re-record the workflow in your new tool in 5 minutes per guide instead of reformatting exported content. For critical SOPs, export from Scribe and import to Notion or Confluence. For routine guides, just re-record.

What are the migration options?

MethodTime per GuideQualityBest For
Re-record with new tool5 minutesHigh — fresh screenshots, updated UIMost guides
Export PDF from Scribe2 minutes + reformattingMedium — static, no editingArchival or compliance records
Copy-paste content10-15 minutesLow — formatting breaks, images may not transferQuick migration of text-heavy guides
Screenshot the Scribe guide5 minutesLow — image of a document, not editableTemporary backup
  1. Inventory your Scribe guides — List all guides, note which are actively used vs archived
  2. Prioritize by usage — Migrate the top 20 most-used guides first
  3. Re-record with Glyde — 5 minutes per guide, captures the current UI with contextual descriptions that are higher quality than Scribe's generic captions
  4. Export to your wiki — Notion or Confluence
  5. Update links — Replace old Scribe links in Slack, email templates, and onboarding docs
  6. Archive Scribe — Keep the Scribe account active for 30 days to catch any missed links

How long does migration take?

Guide CountRe-Record ApproachCopy-Paste Approach
10 guides1 hour2-3 hours
25 guides2-3 hours5-8 hours
50 guides4-5 hours12-15 hours
100 guides8-10 hours (spread over a week)25+ hours

Re-recording is almost always faster than migrating content, and produces better results because the screenshots are current.


This answer is part of our guide to SOP tools compared.

Related Questions

You might also ask

SOP Tools Compared

Why do so many teams end up abandoning heavy documentation platforms like Trainual after a few months?

Teams abandon heavy documentation platforms because the setup takes weeks, content creation is manual and slow, adoption requires everyone to learn a new tool, and the ongoing maintenance burden falls on one person. When the initial champion leaves or gets busy, the platform goes stale. Lightweight tools succeed because they remove the biggest friction: creating the content in the first place.

SOP Tools Compared

Why do some AI SOP generators write much better step descriptions and context than others?

AI SOP generators vary in description quality because they use different levels of context when generating text. Better tools analyze the DOM element (button label, field name, page section), the action type (click, type, navigate), and the surrounding UI context. Weaker tools only capture a screenshot and generate generic descriptions. The difference shows up as 'Click the Submit Order button in the checkout panel' vs 'Click the button.'

SOP Tools Compared

Our remote team is in drastically different time zones, so live screen sharing isn't working; what tool is best for asynchronous process training?

Use a step-by-step guide generator instead of live screen sharing or video calls. A tool like Glyde records your workflow as you perform it and produces a written guide with annotated screenshots that any team member can follow at their own pace, in any time zone. Unlike Loom videos, written guides let the reader jump to specific steps, copy text, and reference the guide while working — no rewinding or pausing required.

Get Started Today

Stop explaining.
Start documenting.

Join hundreds of teams building their knowledge base with Glyde.
Free to start. No credit card required.