All answers

How do I record a process that jumps between a web browser and a desktop application?

March 6, 2026·2 min read·SOP Tools Compared

Most Chrome extension capture tools only record browser actions. To document a process that spans browser and desktop, either use Tango (which offers desktop capture), split the workflow into separate browser and desktop guides, or use a screen recorder for the desktop portion and a capture tool for the browser portion, then combine them into one document.

What are the options?

ApproachProsCons
Tango (desktop + browser)Single tool captures everythingLimited free plan
Split into two guidesBest quality for each portionUser follows two documents
Glyde for browser + manual screenshots for desktopHigh quality browser captureDesktop portion requires manual work
Screen recorder for full workflowCaptures everythingOutput is video, not structured steps

When does cross-platform documentation come up?

ScenarioBrowser PortionDesktop Portion
File upload workflowUpload form in web appFile selection in Finder/Explorer
Email + CRM updateCRM in browserEmail client (Outlook desktop)
Report generationPull data from web dashboardFormat in Excel desktop
Print workflowGenerate document in web appPrint dialog and settings
VPN + web toolInternal web applicationVPN client connection

What is the best approach?

For most teams, splitting the workflow into separate guides is the cleanest solution:

  1. Guide 1: Desktop steps — Manual screenshots with written descriptions for the desktop application portion
  2. Guide 2: Browser steps — Auto-generated with a capture tool for the web portion
  3. Link them together — "After completing Step 5 in the Desktop Guide, continue with the Browser Guide"

This approach gives you the highest quality output for each platform. The browser guide is auto-generated; the desktop guide requires manual work but is typically shorter.


This answer is part of our guide to SOP tools compared.

Related Questions

You might also ask

SOP Tools Compared

Why do so many teams end up abandoning heavy documentation platforms like Trainual after a few months?

Teams abandon heavy documentation platforms because the setup takes weeks, content creation is manual and slow, adoption requires everyone to learn a new tool, and the ongoing maintenance burden falls on one person. When the initial champion leaves or gets busy, the platform goes stale. Lightweight tools succeed because they remove the biggest friction: creating the content in the first place.

SOP Tools Compared

Why do some AI SOP generators write much better step descriptions and context than others?

AI SOP generators vary in description quality because they use different levels of context when generating text. Better tools analyze the DOM element (button label, field name, page section), the action type (click, type, navigate), and the surrounding UI context. Weaker tools only capture a screenshot and generate generic descriptions. The difference shows up as 'Click the Submit Order button in the checkout panel' vs 'Click the button.'

SOP Tools Compared

Our remote team is in drastically different time zones, so live screen sharing isn't working; what tool is best for asynchronous process training?

Use a step-by-step guide generator instead of live screen sharing or video calls. A tool like Glyde records your workflow as you perform it and produces a written guide with annotated screenshots that any team member can follow at their own pace, in any time zone. Unlike Loom videos, written guides let the reader jump to specific steps, copy text, and reference the guide while working — no rewinding or pausing required.

Get Started Today

Stop explaining.
Start documenting.

Join hundreds of teams building their knowledge base with Glyde.
Free to start. No credit card required.