Should I use Scribe or Loom to document my daily workflows?
Use Scribe (or Glyde) for workflows you need people to follow repeatedly — it produces written step-by-step guides with annotated screenshots. Use Loom for one-time explanations, context-setting, or walkthroughs where narration matters. Scribe creates reference documentation; Loom creates communication. Most teams need both, but for daily workflows that must be followed consistently, written guides win.
How do Scribe and Loom compare?
| Factor | Scribe / Glyde | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Written steps + annotated screenshots | Video recording |
| Best for | Repeatable procedures, SOPs | Explanations, demos, feedback |
| Searchable | Yes — full text | No — must watch video |
| Reference during work | Open beside your task | Pause, switch tabs, play |
| Update process | Re-record, new doc in 5 min | Re-record, re-narrate |
| Team follow-along | Step-by-step, self-paced | Watch at video speed |
| Offline use | PDF export available | Requires internet |
| Accessibility | Text + images (no audio needed) | Requires audio or captions |
Which should you use for common scenarios?
| Scenario | Best Tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Daily CRM data entry | Scribe/Glyde | Written steps are easier to follow while working |
| Explaining a project decision | Loom | Context and rationale need narration |
| Onboarding a new hire on ticket handling | Scribe/Glyde | Reference material they will use daily |
| Giving design feedback | Loom | Visual pointing and verbal explanation |
| Documenting a monthly report process | Scribe/Glyde | Must be followed exactly each month |
| Recording a team standup update | Loom | Communication, not documentation |
The simplest rule: if someone needs to follow the content step-by-step while performing a task, use a workflow capture tool. If someone needs to understand context, reasoning, or feedback, use Loom.
This answer is part of our guide to process documentation.